(Tea Party 247) – As you’re likely already aware, there were a number of concerning abnormalities discovered amid the election 2020 data that don’t seem to be diminishing any time soon.
There have been reports of analysis conducted in several of the six key swing states that were rather suspiciously given to Biden and challenged firmly by the Trump campaign, independent groups and individuals, and the RNC.
The Gateway Pundit has done much of this digging, and they are among the few who have continued to report this vital insight into the 2020 election.
Just after the election, they explained this week, they discovered a pattern among the results of Pennsylvania’s race which seemed to them to be impossible, and led to now-President Joe Biden winning the state by a nearly 2 to 1 ratio.
“This was the beginning of a series of reports on patterns found in the 2020 results that were basically impossible. All the patterns ended in Joe Biden’s favor and none of them would be expected to occur in the natural world. They were not random,” TGP explains.
“In Pennsylvania, we determined that in nearly every county, the percentage of absentee ballot votes was directly related to the percentage of election day voter results. When President Trump won a county by 60% (80 to 20%), his absentee ballot performance would be 40% less than that with Biden winning by 60% to 40%. When President Trump won on Election night by 20% (60 to 40%), Biden’s absentee ballot performance would equal 80% to Trump’s 20%. In almost every county, President Trump’s performance in absentee ballots was 40% less than his performance on Election Day,” they continued.
TGP notes that it was also reported that in the state, more ballots were cast than there were total people who voted in the state.
Now, they report that an IT Internet and data expert, JJ Gee, has revealed to them several suspicious data points in the Pennsylvania results which line up with what they reported back on November 13th, just ten days after the election.
“On Election Night, in 29 of 67 counties, the leader margins were similar to the margins in 2016 were when the counting stopped (Statewide 79% reported). 27 of those 29 counties are the only ones that showed 100% reported and two other counties were close to being 100%,” they explain.
The 28 counties which remained did not match the margins from 2016 and showed votes outstanding, when the final votes were added to the counties, all 67 of them had a leader margin that was similar to that of 2016.
When the counting stopped at 79% reporting, Trump was leading in 60 out of 67 counties. The counites of Bucks, Chester, Lehigh, and Monroe, appeared ready to flip red after Hillary won those counties in 2016.
The votes that would go on to be added after this point were 1,338,803, 71% for Biden: 980,425 and 29% for Trump: 358,378. (see graphic below).
TGP debunks the idea that this could be chalked up to the “blue suburbs” that had remained.
The final 1,338,803 votes counted gave Biden 13 counties, 2 of which he supposedly flipped blue—Erie and Northampton.
This will make you see red: in Bucks county, meanwhile, 17,344 votes were added for Biden between November 6 and 20th.
Guess how many votes Biden won by?
What are the odds?
We’ve got to be able to examine this data more closely before it is too late.
Copyright 2021. TeaParty247.org