(Tea Party 247) – Mass shootings have become a regular occurrence in our great nation, tragic events the left has wasted absolutely no time in utilizing for their own agenda, capitalizing on death and destruction to push for strict gun control with the ultimate goal being a complete ban, infringing on the right to bear arms of every American citizen.
This same pattern of behavior was used heavily in the aftermath of the Las Vegas shooting, which left 58 people dead and hundreds injured. It’s important to revisit cases like this and examine all of the evidence that was presented so that we know if we’re really being told the truth about what happened.
When it comes to Stephen Paddock, the man responsible for this horrific tragedy, there’s not a whole lot of details about him or his girlfriend, Marilou Danley. There’s also no clear motive for his crime, which is highly unusual. No manifesto, no long Facebook posts. There’s still no idea why he came and hurt so many people.
However, back in 2018, some court documents were released that dug a little deeper into the actions of Danley, and what she did in the wake of this terrible event.
Marilou Danley was in the Philippines visiting family when Stephen Paddock killed 58 people and injured another 557 in the Oct. 1 attack. She made changes to her Facebook account’s privacy and personal settings at 12:30 a.m., about 2 1/2 hours after the first volley of bullets rained down on people attending a music festival on the Las Vegas strip. The first calls about the shooting rolled in at 10:08 p.m., according to police.
At 2:46 a.m., her account was deleted entirely.
But it wasn’t until nearly an hour after that — 3:30 a.m. — that police released Paddock’s name to the public.
As the New York Post reports, the documents suggest Danley acted quickly after the shooting to conceal her relationship with Paddock.
Why, if she knew nothing about his plans to carry out mass murder, would this woman be so quick to try and cover up any sort of clues about her relationship with him? Something most definitely seems fishy about that, doesn’t it?
Even if she didn’t actually know he was going to carry out this particular attack, the fact she tried to erase her social media accounts that would link her with Paddock says that she must have known he was at least capable of such a horrific act.
All claims by the FBI up to this point have stated Paddock acted alone and Danley has not been charged with any sort of crime. However, the strange behavior immediately following the start of the shooting points that Danley definitely knows more than she is telling.
Was she directly involved in helping Paddock carry out the attack? If so, what was her reason? Was she doing this as some sort of protest? Is she anti-gun? All of these are questions that seem to have no answers. Perhaps one day we’ll finally know the truth of what really happened that day and whether or not something deeper and more sinister was going on underneath it all.